Saturday, September 27, 2014

Bumping for Highsec, Gamis Style

Even our fiercest critics have no choice but to marvel at the New Order's extraordinary impact on highsec life. Before we began our efforts, Hulks and Mackinaws were everywhere. Increasingly, miners have been forced to switch to lower-yield, lower-cargo ships such as Skiffs and Procurers. The sacrifice of yield and cargo in exchange for tank--that's our good influence. Nevertheless, mining permits are required even for our friends in Skiffs and Procurers.


Agent Kalorned, the godfather of Gamis, put together a special video to celebrate the time-honoured practice of miner bumping. To the expert bumper, a heavily-tanked miner is just another fat target.


You can watch Bumping for Highsec and be inspired to bump today. If you don't have gunnery skills, an alt slot for awoxing, or the ability to shed security status, you can still bump your way to a brighter future.

63 comments:

  1. The only good non-compliant is one leaving the immediate area of a belt at 2+km/s.

    Well done. I myself dusted off the ol' cynabal a while back. It's still as fun as ever!

    ReplyDelete
  2. My lawyers are reviewing this as we speak (that is to say right now) and will be making a case for RL harassment against chief turdcock kalorned. DrysonBennington is a powerful man in real life (master of 7 star praying mantis kung fu and various martial arts and master of bation) with many powerful lawyer friends. Your time is up code monkeys (it's definitely time up). Still waiting in nullsec for you (in 0.0)

    ReplyDelete
  3. Where do I find catalyst fits as a new knight?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Try DJEntropy's asshole, it will be there amongst all the mens workboots, lost wrist watches, used condoms and poo stained marrows and cucumbers (hint: it's in his ass)

      (check in his ass)

      Delete
    2. What are the measurements for DJEntropy's rectal orifice?

      Delete
    3. Mostly correct, but Dryson forgot two things, my dead cat aaaaand a poison ivy branch.

      Delete
    4. Sasha Nyemtsov: zKillboard (victim) :P

      Delete
    5. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    6. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    7. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    8. Anon 10:55-
      Lol I'm having keyboard issues today:) You can find it described here:
      http://www.minerbumping.com/2012/12/the-evolution-of-catalyst-pilot.html

      Also you can convo or eve-mail me and I'll send you the fit. You're more than welcome to join my team as well if you want. We are very newbro friendly and would be happy to help you find the path to knighthood! http://knightsofsaintjames.wordpress.com/

      Delete
  4. That's a really great gesture, Malcolm. Surprised to learn you were one of the fallen; surprised and genuinely disappointed. You have been someone whose comments I always held in great regard and read with real interest.. They were chock-full of good solid common sense.

    The best of luck in whatever you decide to do.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Another code terrorist griefer gone! Running out of butt buddies James (really the mittani). Your freemason friends won't stop my lawyers though! (no stopping them) code to be dismantled soon (soon to be dismantled)

    In real life I am 240 pounds of pure muscel (rock hard muscel) and I am hard (i am so hard its unreal) be glad you'll never face DrysonBennington in real pvp combat (i am master of bation 10th dan) I have powerfull friends who are lawyers (very powerful friends)

    ReplyDelete
  6. I shall have to investigate this Orthrus. It looks like a particularly effective bumping vessel, not to discount Agent Kalorned's considerable skill.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Last I checked Retrievers are still everywhere. And Eve is experiencing deflation due to ever more mining. So ya, CODE is kinda a fail.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. So why are a New Order shareholder?
      http://www.minerbumping.com/p/shareholders.html

      Delete
    2. 1 share that I did not purchase...

      Delete
    3. You bought it as a fallback so later you can say you were a James 315 supporter all along.

      Delete
    4. False, I certainly never gave any isk to the code harassers. I oppose Code and think it should disband.

      Delete
    5. More mining would cause inflation not deflation Veers.

      Delete
    6. Oh really.....more raw materials relative to the price of isk would cause inflation? So if ships are incredibly easy and cheap to make, they should cost MORE????? Idiot

      Delete
  8. Also though I'd share some fan mail...

    "Re: Re: A black day for CODE
    From: Cannibal Kane
    Sent: 2014.09.26 00:14
    To: Veers Belvar,

    Hello,

    I am not allied with anybody.  I go where I get paid, simple as that.  It just so happens everybody in AG seems to be dirt poor since CODE pays well.

    And thanks for the correction.  Not all of us that play EVE use English as our first language.

    I will continue my pointless wardecs while you continue your pointless forum posts further alienating not only people that just think your ideas are terrible, but the very same people in the Anti-Ganking channel.

    If I may make a suggestion, if your so against bumping or ganking why not actively go after people?  People might take you a bit more serious (Yes even the clowns in AG might take you serious) if you actually tried to do something instead of just asking CCP to step in.

    Kane"



    How should I respond to Mr. Kane?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well, other than pointing out that "serious" should be "seriously." Didn't DJ used to make the exact same error? Uh oh, do you guys think Kane is an alt of DJ?

      Delete
    2. rofl keep guessing. I have plenty of alts still in game shooting miners, and you're not even close :)

      Delete
    3. Ouch...is that a confirmed ban? Because your initial response was to deny rumors of the ban and insist that you follow the EULA....but hey, honesty never was your strongest suit buddy.....

      Delete
    4. I have not nor will I discuss any matters regarding private matters between myself and CCP :)

      And I do follow the EULA. Always have, always will.

      Delete
    5. http://www.minerbumping.com/2014/09/the-stream-of-justice-part-1.html#comment-form

      And yet here you denied being banned.

      "Still here, just logged in a second ago to update a contest and move some things around. Sorry to disappoint you!

      It's well known that I have always played by the rules and followed the EULA. I hear some people got banned today, but I am sure things will work out just fine :)"

      "Still here, still kicking, not "banned" or whatever people are claiming :)

      Sorry I don't have any drama for you."

      So where your lying then or are you lying now? Perhaps a break from Eve to help you get a grip on reality, and to stop lying, would be helpful.

      Delete
    6. Veers Tears are the sweetest tears.

      Delete
    7. rofl Veers feels he has the right or need to know the status of my EVE accounts.

      Sorry, buddy, i'm just not that into you <3

      Delete
    8. Yes, despite denying it earlier, he got banned. Last actions in Forum / EvE 10.9.2014.
      "I have plenty of alts still in game shooting miners, and you're not even close :)"
      Well i knew that.
      Know what else?
      lez say CODE. has 300 members. Lez say lots of alts is aroung 5.
      300 / 5 = 60 People behind it.
      OK, just a rough guess, but we do remember the AT?
      royalmoron himself commited, that they were not able to muster uo 12 (twelfe) fighters. The lame excuse "we were busy enforcing the code" says basically the same. codies are a sorry little bunch, trying to make a lot of noise.

      Delete
    9. Love unrequited
      Sweetest obsession of all
      Such saccharine tears

      Delete
  9. nice bumps
    shit music tho

    ReplyDelete
  10. My response to Cannibal Kane

    "Kane,

    Apologies for any misunderstandings. I'm actually a big fan of yours, and appreciate the work you do in making highsec corps justify their continued existence. Your continued victories in the face of overwhelming odds are quite impressive. And you are correct that many of the AG folks are lame crybabies, I certainly have no affiliation with them.

    My forum posts are clear, concise, and easily understood. I will continue to make them, whether you, or anyone else for that matter, approves. I believe that a robust exchange of views is essential to the proper functioning of a modern democracy.

    As far as going after bumping and ganking, since my view is that the game mechanics are broken, it makes no sense for me to spend my time trying to combat people exploiting said broken mechanics. My time is better spend on the Eve Forums advocating for positive change.

    Also, it's "seriously" not "serious."

    I'd like to bury the hatchet between us. I'm a big fan of yours, and I would hate for you to harbor any ill will towards me. I hereby offer you an unconditional and permanent peace treaty between our two organizations, so that we can work together to better the Eve Universe.

    Yours,

    Veers

    The true Savior of Highsec"

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. rofl i'm sure Kane is very concerned about your activities and that a "peace treaty" with you would be of some benefit to him whatsoever.

      You really need to get a hold of your USI issues, dude.

      https://encyclopediadramatica.es/Unwarranted_Self-Importance

      Delete
    2. Yes, as opposed to the real life harassment you engaged in that got you permabanned....I wonder which of us needs a shrink, eh?

      Delete
    3. If idling in a channel is defined as harassment in your book, then it is you that needs to see the shrink. Also CCP, needs to see the shrink.

      Delete
    4. Veers Belvar, one day in the future the actions taken by CCP against the player base to permaband by association may be used against you.

      Who knows, CCP may get even more dreconian aginst the player base. Only time will tell.

      Delete
    5. Luckily I'm a really nice guy who never does anything even close to what can get you banned. so I'm not concerned.....

      Delete
    6. Veers be afraid, very afraid of what ccp can do.

      Delete
    7. Why should us who are righteous fear banning by CCP? We have no fear (never to fear) as they're right to ban you code sociopaths (always right to ban, banning) if you got banned you deserved it for being a psychopath ganker tear collector (deserved every bit of ban) yes every bit (all bannings) If you were banned then it was a righteous ban (to say that it was right, wrong - RIGHT!) CCP is always right to ban code.

      In every bit of this freemason owned shitblog (all of it) I have yet to see any real PvP (no PvP here) but that you can hit up DrysonBennington in game for some real PvP lessons (never mess with DrysonBennington) is it to say that you can mess with DrysonBennington? NEVER! Did I say never? Yes I did say never! What, never? I SAID NEVER BITCH! (never)

      Delete
    8. It will only take a GM to decide veers/dyson that you are associated with something that deems you getting a ban from a GM. Then it will be you banned. With no recourse on your part.
      Thats the dangerous path CCP are taking. And its not just code players that have received bans.

      Delete
    9. I'm a PvE player, we don't get banned.

      Delete
    10. "My forum posts are clear, concise, and easily understood."

      lawls

      Delete
    11. Hatchet buried with Kane...

      Re: Re: Re: A black day for CODE
      From: Cannibal Kane
      Sent: 2014.09.28 17:54
      To: Veers Belvar,

      Hi Veers,

      Consider the hatchet buried.  I honestly have no issues with anybody in the game.

      I play EVE the way I play since it works best for the time I got to actually play EVE.  Free ISK, No grinding, and constant wars when I am actually in my own country to play EVE works well and enjoyable.

      On another note thank you for being a fan and please stop correcting my spelling.  I am not english and I am not typing up a proposal so I really do not care for grammar or spelling.

      Truth be told, I really do not like the way bumping works either but i also do not see a quick fix for that no matter how good the proposal might be.  I think it a very big game changer coding wise which is why I do not see anything happening soon.

      I think the best thing is to post a consise and clear idea in the Feature forums and not GD.  But don't dictate how it should work, describe the issue and ask what can be be done to make an improvement.

      I got many wardec Ideas to make thing better but I want to wait and see where CCP is going come December with another big feature release.  Since I might be looking at finally dissapearing into a WH with a large group or join a Null/Low Alliance like Rook&Kings.  But that depends, as long as I am not dictated to how I must play we will see.

      Kane

      Delete
    12. Anonymous September 28, 2014 at 7:08 PM: HOW DARE YOU BITCH! I bet you are the griefer who blew my MTUs all the time (to say they were killed? dead) WELL FUCK YOU YOU THINK YOU CAN FUCK WITH DRYSONBENNINGTON? (that you really think? to really really think?) Come to nullsec bitch and I'll show you real mans pvp (REAL MANS PVP)

      Do you realize how h

      Delete
  11. Actual miner bumping on minerbumping? I thought that died out when the testosterone junkies took over and decided to blow stuff up instead.

    Nice to see that someone has some actual sense.

    ReplyDelete
  12. "DJ EntropySeptember 28, 2014 at 3:42 AM

    rofl keep guessing. I have plenty of alts still in game shooting miners, and you're not even close :)"

    So DJames315, it is allowed to consider, that you have more EvE Alts than actual underwear!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Confirming that I own far more paids of underwear then alts in EVE online.

      Also confirming that if you want to discuss my underwear, you should probably take that to private message. You're creeping me out, man :-)

      Delete
  13. Veers I just remembered your epic fail suggestion that bumping ships should bring on a concord response because somehow in your demented world you think the two are the same thing... I was just wondering if you still hold that belief?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I never suggested a "CONCORD response." What i did suggest is that once CONCORD is on scene ships should be able to warp off for 60 seconds unaffected by bumping.

      Delete
    2. Holy crap that is worse then i first thought... Any catalyst on field would be able to claim it got bumped and would be free to warp off before concord locked it down.

      Delete
    3. no, once CONCORD arrives the gankers get scrammed and cant warp off - bumping is irrelevant.

      Delete
    4. But how would concord know who is a ganker and who is not? and how would concord determine that the freighter did not bump the ganker?

      Delete
    5. huh? The point is that CONCORD would show up and scram the criminals. Everyone else could warp off unaffected by bumping.

      Delete
    6. More veers fail.

      Where is vengaza when you need him.

      Delete
    7. Let me clear this up for you. Let's say there's 40 billion ISK worth of ships floating in a POS, but you don't know the PW so you can't steal them easily. Here's what you do: you have an alt summon Concord, Concord makes it so that you can no-clip through all barriers with magic, you get into the POS with enough pilots, and steal all the ships. Now does Veers's suggestion make sense?

      Delete
    8. Veers, the real point is that your suggestion is so wrong how can anyone take you seriously if that's the best you can come up with for a problem you fabricated yourself.

      Delete
    9. How is it "wrong?"

      Delete
    10. Anonymous, the real point is that when you use so many pronouns in a discussion with Veers, the other Veers, Beers, and 6 anonymous posters; no one has any idea wtf you are trying to say.

      Delete
  14. I’m commenting after reading much of the blog and almost all of the comments for the past few months.

    Agents of the New Order seem to have an absolute mastery of self-control in the face of vile and disgusting remarks from bot-aspirant players and the AG community in general. I’ve seen agents in local chat and they always maintained complete professionalism when conversing with local or a specific pilot. On the other hand, the multitude of local pilots that get involved in the conversation almost always instantly degrade to a level of swearing and personal insults.

    The amount of ISK that supporters are donating. The New Order obviously has a large following and players that support their cause via donations to continue the work. I’ve looked on the AG web site and they don’t seem to have any comparable apparatus in place like James 315 has setup to support MineBumping.com.

    MineBumping with an eloquently written manifesto clearly illustrates a vision for highsec that lays out the dangers of continued bot-aspirant behavior for all EVE players. Reading comments from the anti-CODE posters in here and the AG Blog it is clear that they have no interest in the future of EVE. They almost always resort to disgusting or vile rhetoric and offer no real educational benefit to the bot-aspirant and newer players of EVE.

    Personally I hope EVE players in general listen to the advice that is freely given on proper tanking and being aware of their surroundings. Sounds like very good advice dispensed by MineBumping and the Agents. For the AG Community, maybe CCP in their crusade to level the playing field will introduce a high slot factional “petition” module that you may overheat to file useless petitions faster with.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Insanity requires the most suave of emotions.

      Delete
  15. The Code ALWAYS Wins!!!! ALWAYS!!!!

    ReplyDelete

Note: If you are unable to post a comment, try enabling the "allow third-party cookies" option on your browser.